Useful fields, not guesses
A missing strength grade stays missing. Conflicting document revisions remain visible until a person resolves them.
RFQ workflow
See how a scoped RFQ workflow can bring input details, missing information and human review into one preparation process. The example below is synthetic and illustrative.
Emails, drawings and sheets in formats assessed for the pilot.
Structure the draft and retain references to its sources.
Surface missing details, conflicts and unsupported information.
Your reviewer checks the draft and approves every final quote.
01 / Input summary
Please prepare a quote for 2,000 M12 × 60 hex bolts in zinc-plated steel. The spreadsheet asks for delivery by 18 November. The attachment lists the material but does not state a strength grade. Please confirm availability.
Filenames and content are invented for this example. These are sample summaries, not downloadable files.
02 / Prepared draft
Strength grade requires buyer clarification. Stock and lead time require an internal check.
Illustrative only · no live AI extraction · no files uploaded · no quote sent
A missing strength grade stays missing. Conflicting document revisions remain visible until a person resolves them.
The sample contains no prices, cost model, commercial terms or delivery commitment. Those need separate validation.
Recording a review note is an acknowledgement, not a resolution. A person must still clarify and verify the information.
A visual example cannot establish performance. A pilot uses agreed samples and your team’s baseline to understand whether the workflow is useful.
How a pilot is evaluatedStart with a conversation
Tell us what arrives, what your team checks, and where preparation slows down. An initial discussion needs no software installation or confidential drawings.
Contact the SJAITECH team
[email protected]Use this address in your preferred email app.
Delivery hours, time zone and pilot scope are agreed together.